
The phrase "naive physics" refers to people's untrained knowledge of the way the world works. For instance, people learn at an early age that when you drop something it's going to fall, even if they don't yet know why this happens. It's understanding based on common sense, rather than academic knowledge. And it works well, but it has limits.
I guess you could call my writing "naive writing." For the most part, I've been working purely on instinct. I know what to do, but I don't know the reasons for it. I don't think about it consciously, it just feels right. And it's worked well for me... but it has limits.
I'm at a point now where I'm trying to consciously learn all the things I've been unconsciously doing. As a part of this effort, I'm reading
Characters and Viewpoint by Orson Scott Card, since it's so highly recommended. I'm learning some interesting things from it. For instance, the idea of the
MICE Quotient. In this view, there are four types of stories - the Milieu story, which is dominated by the setting; the Idea story, which is dominated by a mystery; the Character story, which is dominated by a character's transformation; and the Event story, which is dominated by an event that disrupts the natural order. Thinking about this view in relation to my own stories, I discovered what may have gone wrong with
Ascension (besides the fact that it was almost completely unplanned and that's not my natural way of working). It was a Character story, but in the absence of a coherent plot, it took on the structure of a Milieu story. The milieu, however, left a lot to be desired, because it wasn't supposed to be the main focus of the story.
It's interesting to consciously analyze things like that; it gives a different perspective, a useful one. And I'm not losing my instinctive knowledge, everything I've absorbed from many years of reading and writing; I'm just adding to it.